[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created

To: ZZ Development <zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
From: Tuomas Lukka <lukka@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:30:19 +0300
In-reply-to: <20010404095806.B30955@gaia.iki.fi>; from gaia@iki.fi on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:58:06AM +0300
Mail-followup-to: ZZ Development <zzdev@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20010403193324.A22469@gaia.iki.fi> <3ACA3002.5C28FBB8@gmx.de> <20010404095806.B30955@gaia.iki.fi>

> (in ZZViewComponent)
> 
> I think it's better to get one too much than none (you can always
> backspace off the extra one).
> 
> However, should this be made a run-time choice (a command-line switch
> -umlautahck or something)?

We should make an extra class that all keyevents go through, with a name like
ZZUmlautHack.java. This class sniffs the behaviour and does the right thing 
(returns the right type of keyevent)(

	Tuomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
  - From: B. Fallenstein

References:
- 0.6 branch created
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
- Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
  - From: B. Fallenstein
- Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho

Prev by Date: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
Next by Date: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
Previous by thread: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
Next by thread: Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] Re: [zzdev] 0.6 branch created
Index(es):